Call Recording Laws in Maryland
Plain-English summary
Maryland is an all-party-consent state. Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402(a) prohibits the willful interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, and unlike the federal statute, the Maryland statute requires the consent of all parties to the communication (§ 10-402(c)(3)).
A participant in a Maryland phone call must obtain consent from every other party before recording. The civil remedy at § 10-410 provides actual damages with statutory minimums, punitive damages where appropriate, and attorney’s fees.
Case law of note
No appellate decision in Maryland has materially reshaped the participant-recording rule in recent decades. Lower-court decisions exist but do not change the analytical framework set by the statute and by general federal precedent under § 2511.
Edge cases and special rules
- In-person vs. phone. Same — all-party
- Voicemail. Leaving a message creates the recording at the recipient’s direction; reviewing one’s own voicemail is not interception.
- Vicarious consent. Several federal courts have recognized a parental-consent doctrine permitting a parent to consent on behalf of a minor child (Pollock v. Pollock, 154 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1998)). State law varies; no controlling Maryland appellate decision on the question.
- Law enforcement. Court-authorized intercepts are governed by a separate framework and are outside the scope of this page.
- Cross-border calls. Where any participant is in an all-party state, treat the stricter rule as the safer default. See cross-border calls.
Penalties and remedies
Criminal: Felony; up to 5 years and/or $10,000.
Civil: Yes — § 10-410 provides actual and statutory damages.
Evidence: a recording made in violation of the Maryland statute is generally inadmissible in Maryland proceedings. Federal § 2515 separately bars use of unlawfully intercepted communications in federal proceedings.
Practical guidance
- If you are recording an ordinary phone call: obtain audible consent from every party at the start of the call.
- Suggested opening: See our consent script templates for jurisdiction-specific language.
- If the other party objects: stop recording. Continued recording over an objection is a separate factual question that no consent statute helps you with.
- What to keep: the date and time of the call, the parties’ phone numbers, a description of the consent given (express verbal, continued participation after notice, etc.), and the audio file itself.
Compare to
- Virginia
- Delaware
- Pennsylvania
- US federal law (the Wiretap Act baseline)
- One-party vs. all-party consent explained
- Cross-border calls